Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SATMAP (system)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:42, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

SATMAP (system)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article about a technology product. The article's references consist of primary sources, press releases and superficial news coverage generated from press releases. Fails WP:GNG for lack of available independent sources. - MrX 02:25, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Product-spam, refs are PR, press releases, niche media. Not seeing any coverage that would make this encyclopedic. We are not a repository of products or services sold sold unless they are notable. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not only is this advertising, but it appears to be a tendril of another bit of company boosting. (I would have thought that satellite mapping would own this lemma.) No indication that this particular trademark is notable, nor this business referred to. Hithladaeus (talk) 14:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as spam. Failing that, delete per WP:PROMO, and fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.