Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCII Arcade: Project Haven


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NorthAmerica1000 23:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

SCII Arcade: Project Haven

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hot Coffee or DotA aside, since when have mods been notable, let alone one made with a mod editor? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. A: When they're covered by abundant, secondary, reliable sources. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It did not have any meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources search. Would entertain a redirect to a StarCraft-related article if there is a single secondary source that would host such a connection. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar ♔   07:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 20:38, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: I couldn't find any notable references. Mods aren't notable for Wikipedia unless they have enough coverage, like the previously mentioned DotA and others. StewdioMACK (talk) 06:14, 1 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - no sources in the article and I can find none myself that would establish this as notable. -- Whpq (talk) 02:06, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.