Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCLC New Orleans (LA) Chapter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

SCLC New Orleans (LA) Chapter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not read encyclopedic and possibly contains original research. Aasim 20:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Aasim 20:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is indeed promotional in tone and full of OR in content, and looks like it was written by a COI editor. Relevant content is already found in Southern Christian Leadership Conference--this is not a case of one chapter being obviously notable in its own right. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, for reasons stated by Drmies. Anything important should probably be moved to the Southern Christian Leadership Conference page if it's not already there and can be properly sourced, but as this is currently written, it's not encyclopedic and portions violate WP:PROMOTION. Also, I can't figure out why the references are listed the way they are. Kalethan (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , it is because didn't read WP:INLINECITE, and instead of making footnotes that would be gathered in a reflist, they used the "ref" template like this,, to make superscript notes in the text (they could have used the superscript tag for it, had they known what they were doing); there is a bot that automatically adds a reflist at the bottom of the text when it sees "ref" tags but no reflist template. They've been here since 2011, and unfortunately they are not, apparently, inclined to participate here. Drmies (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.