Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCMS Journal of Indian Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to SCMS Cochin School of Business. Star  Mississippi  00:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

SCMS Journal of Indian Management

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Agree with the hathote from 2013 that the page does not meet the GNG. Nothing on the page suggests that this journal is notable. JMWt (talk) 10:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 10:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management and India.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. I originally put that notability tag. Nowadays I'd have PRODded it or taken to AfD. However, since 2013 the journal has been accepted for indexing by Scopus (a selective index) and several les selective indices, so this meets WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 14:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to SCMS Cochin School of Business as an WP:ATD - Seems not to meet WP:GNG, better covered on an organizational page or in a list. Passing mention in The New Indian Express, included in a random research guide, passing mention in a press release. Suriname0 (talk) 14:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to SCMS Cochin School of Business per Suriname0. It would make sense for this to have a section in that article, and for the name of the journal to go there, but I don't see this journal as meeting the WP:GNG nor any subject-specific notability guideline at this time. WP:NJOURNALS is an essay, and WP:N only presumes notability for GNG-passing and/or SNG-passing items that don't fall afoul of WP:NOT, so we can't keep as a standalone article on that basis. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 19:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.