Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SC Bor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge/redirect. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

SC Bor

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seems to be a small sports arena in a small town for a local team. Don't see how this can pass WP:GNG. GrainyMagazine (talk) 00:37, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: What does SC stand for?  I wouldn't automatically assume its not notable, we just want to make sure we search on the right terms before concluding its not.--Milowent • hasspoken  22:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment It's worth noting that an arena of the same size in an English-speaking country would probably be considered notable; for example, consider the arenas at Template:USHL Arenas, which are about the same size. Granted, this article has no references and I can't find any, but since any references are probably in Serbian they may be hard to find. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Are there sources to meet WP:GNG? If not much else is found on this subject, it would be more suitable to merge and redirect to Bor, Serbia.—Bagumba (talk) 00:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. SC stands for "Sportski centar" (Sport center), so the article should be moved to Sport Center Bor. Judging on Google, they (used to) have a detailed web page, http://www.sportskicentarbor.com, however This domain name expired on 01/21/2012 and is pending renewal or deletion. There are plenty of references (or better, mentions), all in Serbian., , , , though most of them are local. Based on size and local importance, I suppose it is just barely notable to pass GNG. No such user (talk) 08:37, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per No such user. While I'm just about on the fence with this, I'm going to AGF it based on the mentions in those sources. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC) Delete per my comment below. The original creator made a slew of questionably-notable basketball arenas with little to no sources, and this one in particular doesn't exactly scream notable. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - For what it's worth, the user who created this AfD in question also created Sports Hall Smederevo, SRC Kraljevica, SRC Dubočica and Sc slana bara (before it was redirected). Now I'm starting to hear kittens meowing. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Bor, Serbia Source #1 (mentioned above by ) is not WP:INDEPENDENT, produced by the arena. Source #2 is a press release from the arena. Source #3 has an excerpt with a trivial mention of the arena, with a dead link to the supposed full article.  Source #4 is more about the airport than the arena, and is not significant coverage.  No evidence of meeting WP:GNG.  The meowing is loud on my side as well.  Merge and redirect to the article on the city in the interest of WP:PRESERVE.  Otherwise, delete.—Bagumba (talk) 22:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No, Source #1 is by local Radio television Zaječar, about financial troubles of the center, and it was only uploaded to Vimeo by the arena. Still, taken together, the level of coverage is as could be expected for an arena of a mid-size town; probably much more exist in archives of paper editions of local media. I don't, however, have an issue with merging this poor kitten somewhere, as it's rather unlikely that a good soul will expand it one day to a reasonable level of detail. Even the Bor, Serbia article is in rather poor condition. No such user (talk) 13:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 01:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)




 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.