Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDG 14 and the Rio Conventions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge into Sustainable Development Goals and Rio Convention. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have read through this article and can find no viable reason for its combination of two independent topics. SDG 14 is already covered in its own section at Sustainable Development Goals, and there is also a separate article for Rio Convention. This article seems to have been created because the author noticed that SDG 14 was discussed at recent Rio Conventions, but many things are discussed at those conventions. The text in this article could be split up and used to enhance those two existing articles. But putting the two topics together in this one article raises issues under the personal essay and original research standards. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC) ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:30, 24 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –&#8239;Joe (talk) 11:23, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge notable and well sourced material to the two related articles. This standalone title does not warrant an independent article for reasons given by nom. --mikeu talk 12:59, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge, splitting between the two primary articles as outlined by nom. This synthesis article seems unnecessary, if well sourced. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.