Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDSU Sports Deck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to San Diego State Aztecs. Keep proponents haven't presented any sources or argument why the subject meets WP:GNG or another notability guideline. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  18:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

SDSU Sports Deck

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This was initially a redirect to San Diego State Aztecs but an edit war is now taking place. It is quite clear that SDSU Sports Deck does not have any significant coverage whatsoever in independent sources so the stand-alone article is not justified. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBUILD and the redirect should be restored. There is not currently any Wikipedia guideline that says a stadium is exempt from meeting notability criteria. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to San Diego State Aztecs, as before. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to San Diego State Aztecs, as it falls short of WP:GNG. signed,Rosguill talk 17:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to San Diego State Aztecs, not independently notable but a possible search term. GiantSnowman 17:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to San Diego State Aztecs Agreed. It does not meet the requirements forWP:GNG, however it is ok to redirect as stated above... --Kemalcan (talk) 07:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:GNG Quidster4040 (talk) 13:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Which sources led you to this conclusion? signed,Rosguill talk 16:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep All the teams in the league have the stadium articles. "In categories of items with a finite number of entries where most are notable, it serves no useful purpose to endlessly argue over the notability of a minority of these items." Ludost Mlačani (talk) 15:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * No that's not true at all, New Mexico State Aggies, Utah Valley Wolverines, Chicago State Cougars and many others do not have articles. Notability is not inherited so the fact that some colleges might have a notable stadium does not mean that all college stadiums across the entire USA are automatically notable. Your assertion that we are singling this one stadium out is also false as there have been at least six up for AfD recently and that's just the US ones. There have also been many Spanish non-notable stadiums up for deletion with the exact same rationale, which is that there is simply no evidence that they meet GNG or NBUILD. This discussion is about this particular stadium so unless someone can prove that this stadium meets criteria, it is not notable. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.