Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SD Loveday


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:45, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

SD Loveday

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a single Google news hit for this company, there are six hits, but they are all from the 1800`s :o) The Last Angry Man (talk) 23:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 05:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

This is true - composers don't seen to get much press. But search "Stephen Loveday" or "Darren Loveday" on Google videos and there are 4-5 pages of results of their film and TV compositions. (Sorry I haven't done this Discussion before - hope I'm doing it right?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isletsoflangerhans (talk • contribs) 06:34, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - The references in the article, and googling around certainly can verify that Stepehen and Darren Loveday are working composers providing original music for a variety of productions. However, the credits are to the individuals, and make no mention of the company "SD Loveday" which is the subject of the article.  I can find no substantial coverage about "SD Loveday" in independent reliable sources to meet WP:CORP, the inclusion guidelines for companies.  Looking at the individuals that form the company, I can find no substantial coverage about them individually  either.  Substantial coverage about either composer would suggest that converting to a personal biography as a solution, but in this case, without that coverage, it's not advisable. -- Whpq (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)




 * delete fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage in any of the references. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.