Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEEBURGER


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  05:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

SEEBURGER

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Company that does not appear to meet the notability guidelines listed at WP:CORP. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:57, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete. Searches revealed a lot of passing mentions and a lot of press releases, but there was no significant coverage in independent sources. Dawn Bard (talk) 12:51, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.