Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEEDS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article still unsourced = mandatory deletion per WP:V.  Sandstein  05:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

SEEDS

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

nn organization tagged unref since 2016 Staszek Lem (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 07:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 07:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Times of India, Hindustan Times. w umbolo   ^^^  14:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * These links just mention SEEDS; there is no description of this organization. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:50, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * But it counts toward notability because it has significant coverage. w umbolo   ^^^  20:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, you may be right here. Still, these refs look more like routine press releases than general, independent discussion of the organization. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)


 * You've misunderstood the criteria for notability, Wumbolo. It is not sufficient to have "significant coverage" in sources. The coverage must be through specific and extensive references to the subject, which we cannot find in the articles you cite. (Not to mention that the sources themselves, where the "significant coverage" is found, must be reliable. I'm saying this only for the sake of clarity and completion, since Times of India and the rest are reliable.) -The Gnome (talk) 15:06, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:13, 9 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment : If sources that support notability can be found, now is the time to add 'em! -The Gnome (talk) 15:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not meet WP:NORG and significant RS coverage not found. The sources offered above are very minor passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.