Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEO Services & Search Engine Optimization Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 02:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

SEO Services & Search Engine Optimization Company

 * — (View AfD)

Details about how a page must look like to rank well are always speculation and vary from SE to SE. See the Search Engine Optimization article for details. roy&lt;sac&gt; Talk! .oOo. 10:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom and because nobody's ever going to search under this title. FreplySpang 14:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, how-to guide, fails WP:NOT. NawlinWiki 15:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete very strange article written in second person, mostly redundant with the far better (and referenced) article Search engine optimization. I suspect the real reason for its existence is to insert the URL at the end into Wikipedia. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT a how-to-guide. We are not going to search like that. Ter e nce Ong 16:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Jehochman (Talk/Contrib) 21:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertising vaguely cloaked as how-to, non-encyclopedic on both counts.  Athænara  ✉ 12:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam, bizarre spam, but spam nonetheless. SkierRMH, 09:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.