Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SGMS methodology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

SGMS methodology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. An earlier PROD was deleted by WP:SPA without resolving the issue. I re-PROD, which was endorsed, then removed on a technicality. Derek Andrews (talk) 01:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete jargon/buzzword that doesn't seem to be in wide use. WP:NEO is relevant.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NEO --j⚛e deckertalk 15:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.