Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SG Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 18:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

SG Records

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I would have speedied this, but I feel that this article might be better suited for the Italian wikipedia as there are probably more NON-ENGLISH sources, but since I cannot read Italian I cannot tell what is a notable source and what isn't, so I propose a transwiki to the Italian side. ArcAngel (talk) 14:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no reason to believe it's notable. JohnWBarber (talk) 00:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Notability is not language specific. If there is non-trivial coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject, English or Italian, then the subject is notable and we keep the article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this record label. Joe Chill (talk) 00:37, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.