Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHEI magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete  -  file lake  shoe  16:28, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

SHEI magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Surely fails notability. Rd232 talk 01:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Borderline Keep. Two local newspaper articles used as sources and other sources seem to be available. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. There is one local paper ref but it isn't enough to establish notability. It's just a student newspaper of little importance. Szzuk (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think that the sources I found, even taken together, constitute significant coverage. To be fair, student publications at very large colleges, like the University of Michigan, may very well be notable. For example, The Michigan Daily pretty clearly merits an article. However, student fashion magazines that are only published semi-annually are not very likely to attract the coverage necessary for inclusion in Wikipedia – even at the University of Michigan. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:58, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete This is nowhere near being a notable subject. No mass circulation, no outside mentions, not published on a consistent enough basis to become mainstream or accesible to larger audiences.208.54.86.207 (talk) 19:18, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.