Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHIELD - Autonomous Risk Intelligence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus article does not meet NCORP. Any undeletion, del rev etc consideration should note the copyright violation Nosebagbear (talk) 16:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

SHIELD - Autonomous Risk Intelligence

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no meaningful coverage - all I can find are basic biz announcements and PR about their name change. Praxidicae (talk) 14:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete The opening paragraph is a copyright violation from the bottom paragraph on this page on their website. Not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion nor a directory service. Topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing++ 12:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete HighKing is right about the copyvio from the subject's website - that could be fixed of course, and isn't a reason to delete, but it is indicative of possible UPE, and I'm not seeing sourcing sufficient for an NCORP pass: better just to delete the whole article. Girth Summit  (blether)  15:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.