Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIGOS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

SIGOS

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advert masquerading as an article, most of the sources are rehashed press releases, and the tone, product lists etc. are just so promotional. Doubt they're notable, but if they are then TNT would be best IMO. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:39, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:39, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – The tone of this article suggests to me that they are trying to be persuasive. CLCStudent (talk) 17:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * NOT Delete – The wording was changed to a neutral perspective. Company-own press releases have been removed and references from external sources have been added instead. Self-promotional tone has been removed .  15:01, 22 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weisssigos (talk • contribs)  — Weisssigos (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * No, your attempt to fix it made it so much worse, and just a product directory. I've reverted it. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your feedback Joseph2302 and apologies for not declaring my affiliation to the company, I was not aware of the COI Issue. I like to disagree though that my changes made it so much worse, as per your comment. As per Wikipedia guidelines I included verifiable articles and references from independent, third-party reliable resources, such as the independent worldwide GSMA Association, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) or the international market research and analysis company Frost & Sullivan, to whom SIGOS has no relationship and therefore no COI.

In the history section I also removed all self-promotion information. Also the product overview was changed into descriptive text instead of advertising tone. Maybe you could point out where exactly the new wording still sounded like advertising, instead of descriptive facts? I'm new here and like to make it right. Hope the declaration of my affiliation with SIGOS is now also correct? Many thanks in advance

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Is there any more/other feedback to the new wording by me, Weisssigos which was all deleted/reverted to the old wording by Joseph2302 ? I still believe it should have not been reverted as per my comments above. Looking forward to some more feedback/help to have an entry which complies with wikipedia guidelines. Thanks Weisssigos

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the "NOT Delete" is not suggesting how this article can be noticeably improved thus I am suggesting Delete because none of this currently suggests both satisfying the applicable notability and the necessary improvements....therefore Delete for now. SwisterTwister   talk  04:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.