Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIM Reservoir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 15:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

SIM Reservoir

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no indication of notability: No citatations given, and brief searches have failed to produce any significant independent coverage. PROD was removed with an edit summary saying "this product has unique features that makes it noteworthy", but no indication was given of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:22, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication in searches that it has an notability. No hits on Google News Search; 217 hits on Google Web Search (company's own hits, youtube, wiki, job vacancy notices... nothing reliable or indicating independently that it is notable). --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 14:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. I don't see anything indicating it's notable.  I'm out of my field, so it's kind of weak, but it still doesn't show holding to WP's standards or sources. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 00:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I was going to propose a merge to this tool's developer, Kongsberg SIM; however, the lack of sources, which cannot aid a merge, leads me to say delete. Cunard (talk) 06:09, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.