Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SJD Accountancy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

SJD Accountancy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is advertising. They have won top place in awards that don't matter, but done poorly in ones that might indicate notability like the Sunday Times one. Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:06, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:47, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:47, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:47, 23 January 2014 (UTC)


 * weak keep I see no reason to keep this – but then I have no policy reason to delete it, so we're stuck with it. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:57, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. As nom says, its an advert - written by a human robot. Szzuk (talk) 21:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 19:30, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Advert or not, it meets WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 04:42, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's notable. -- do ncr  am  19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.