Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SKI-PP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

SKI-PP

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable record company - fails WP:CORP no significant coverage of the company appears to exist ONLY claim to to notability is one of inheritance through bands who (may ?) have released songs via this company. Unreferenced. Codf1977 (talk) 06:46, 5 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. No substantial coverage. 5 years old and still a stub. Fails WP:ORG. Christopher Connor (talk) 02:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect to DAT Politics as they created the label. There's no need to merge as the meagre information in the article already exists at the target article. -- Whpq (talk) 19:55, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.