Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SKINMASK


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I'm sorry Jaydepps but the delete !voters make the stronger argument here. To meet criterion 11 of WP:BAND they have to be added to the rotation of a "major radio or music television network" not just a few stations. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

SKINMASK

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines for bands or the general notability guideline (contested prod) – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 22:35, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep It appears to meet criteria #11 as their song Day After Day is in rotation nationally by several notable rock stations including 99x and Rock 108. It is currently ranked 24 in Rock 108's top 40. On top of the radio attention it is frequently played on the Music Choice Rock channel which qualifies as "music television network". -Jaydepps (talk) 12:50, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Article needs major rework, but if it meets criteria #11 then it should stay. Needs major overhaul of sources, context and grammar. Probably a lot more sources out there, but radio play is one of those things which don't translate into text well. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:42, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The band does not pass #11. 99x and Rock 108 are single stations, not networks and they are not national. The charts for Rock 108 (which should not be used (WP:BADCHARTS)) suggest local rotation there but claim of 99x rotation is not verified. Band lacks coverage and does not meet any of WP:BAND. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  →TSU tp* 06:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Good luck with their career. Getting on the rotation of a coupe of radio stations is good, but a couple of stations does not constitute a major network. No prejudice to recreation in the future if the meet notability then. -- Whpq (talk) 17:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.