Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SK Jewellery Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

SK Jewellery Group

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable organization that doesn’t satisfy WP:NCORP. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search linked me to primary sources thus aren’t independent of the organization hence does next to nothing to establish notability. Celestina007 (talk) 22:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep I did a prior search in Googlenews before creating this page. When you search "SK Jewellery Group" in googlenews, the result shows as follows


 * https://www.google.com/search?q=SK+Jewellery+Group&newwindow=1&tbm=nws&sxsrf=ALeKk021tfN7oNHBlwwxMYE1FzXx_hQqgg:1616577846698&ei=NgVbYJ6ZKqG3gwfx7r6oAQ&start=0&sa=N&ved=0ahUKEwiejLfizcjvAhWh2-AKHXG3DxU4ChDy0wMIggE&biw=1366&bih=625&dpr=1


 * A lot of sources from Business Times (Singapore) and The Straits Times. These are organic sources earned by the subject.


 * There are also other sources found such as https://www.asiaone.com/business/sk-jewellery-launches-lab-grown-diamond-brand-star-carat-shop-diamonds-millenials, and this


 * https://www.theedgesingapore.com/news/company-news/sk-jewellery-shares-surge-over-50-upon-receiving-privatisation-offer


 * and many others. I believe that those are reliable sources. From the above, I strongly believe that the topic meets WP:SIGCOV, WP:GNG and WP:NCORP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Va-be-Fratellis (talk • contribs) 09:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Question I notice that you created the article in one edit. For a newbie editor, this is very unusual. Have you ever edited Wikipedia previously? Do you have a connection with the company?  HighKing++ 17:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep There are plenty of articles about SK Jewellery in on national newspapers. A search on Singapore' newspapers archive shows 500+ articles. Although there are a number of articles being native content advertisements, through there I can eventually find information such as: https://www.todayonline.com/business/soo-kee-breaks-new-ground-thai-partner-aurora, https://www.straitstimes.com/business/companies-markets/soo-kee-group-launches-bullion-business, https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/today20150812-1.2.52.4?ST=1&AT=filter&DF=&DT=&AO=false&NPT=&L=&CTA=&NID=&CT=ARTICLE&WC=&YR=&k=sk+jewellery%26ka%3dsk+jewellery&P=3&Display=0&filterS=0&QT=sk,jewellery&oref=article https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/today20150228-1.2.20.4?ST=1&AT=filter&DF=&DT=&AO=false&NPT=&L=&CTA=&NID=&CT=ARTICLE&WC=&YR=&k=sk+jewellery%26ka%3dsk+jewellery&P=4&Display=0&filterS=0&QT=sk,jewellery&oref=article. I concur with Va-be-Fratellis' vote. – robertsky (talk) 16:39, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. – robertsky (talk) 16:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't pass based on any reference I've seen. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content".
 * "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.
 * An examination of the references hasn't uncovered any reference that meets the criteria. The Business Times and Straits Times articles I've seen are announcement and PR or interviews - fails WP:ORGIND. The references from The Edge mentioned above are also announcements or comments on share prices - there's nothing that meets the requirement for "Independent Content" as per ORGIND.
 * I'm happy to revisit my !vote if someone turns up some good references - perhaps an analyst report might exist that I haven't found. In the meantime, I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 18:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Reads like an ad, and doesn't seem too notable. References are either primary or, as HighKing said, "announcement and PR or interviews". AdoTang (talk) 14:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - of particular concern is the repeated sourcing and citing in the article from the topic's own website with grandiose claims of this award and that award, etc. with no organization actually listed that gave the topic an award in the first place, and no independent sources found covering these "notable milestones" or "awards". Megtetg34 (talk) 18:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with the above, mostly press releases or quotes from their own website.Oaktree b (talk) 22:32, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. Alhtough there is a lot of coverage, all are Tier 2 publications, nothing well known. Webmaster862 (talk) 02:34, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * additional comment: straitstimes.com and businesstimes.com sources have been used multiples times. Per Wiki guidelines, multiple sources from same publication would be counted once.Webmaster862 (talk) 02:39, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.