Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SLAMPP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Delete Nobody proposed keeping the article, and nobody felt that it was notable enough for a stand-alone description. There are suggestions that this could be part of a page about border-line notability Linux applications, but there is no page at the moment. Mandsford 21:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

SLAMPP

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Delete, no third-party coverage to establish notability. Yworo (talk) 23:32, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge Merge all such borderline-notable Linux distributions (including SLAMPP and currently AfD'd Santa Fe Linux) into new page Minor Linux distributions, making this new page somewhat similar to pages like List of minor characters in the Matrix series - a list of entities which don't really merit their own article, but are notable enough to be mentioned in the context of another article. Ipsign (talk) 15:01, 30 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ipsign (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Tricky. There is very limited evidence of notability. When a magazine has a Linux distribution on its DVD, there is usually an accompanying article, but I could find no evidence of this. I think we should have a list of borderline notable Linux distributions in which each can get a short section, related to List of Linux distributions. Maybe create that and merge the article there. Hans Adler 07:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.