Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SLOOP Project (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

SLOOP Project
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Tagged for notability and sourcing issues for over a decade. No evidence of significant coverage in secondary sources; the only Google scholar hit has three citations. Previous AfD resulted in no consensus. The sole reliable source located in that discussion is a passing mention. Judging by the primary sources, the main contributor to the article appears to be a single-purpose account closely connected with the topic. WP:TNT Jfire (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Software. Jfire (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination jengod (talk) 23:32, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, there is no evidence of notability either in the article or outside it. This appears to have been a run-of-the-mill project with primary-only sources from project members. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete only primary sources, nothing additional found with a search. TheManInTheBlackHat   (Talk)  16:43, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.