Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SLUG Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. per WP:SNOW, editing has addressed the nom's concerns. Mgm|(talk) 19:23, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

SLUG Magazine

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article on an underground magazine which lacks a single independent source and has not been fixed despite being tagged for improvement since July 2007. Guy (Help!) 22:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is indeed almost 20 years old. I'll work on it. Cool Hand Luke 00:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep AFD is not cleanup. See WP:NOEFFORT. Colonel Warden (talk) 12:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Longstanding magazine. Article already improved. --Michig (talk) 14:31, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep — looks good enough to establish notability, now. MuZemike  ( talk ) 17:51, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.