Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMARTS software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 14:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

SMARTS software

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:SOFTWARE -- Y not? 03:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find anything on their website or in google news that constitutes a reliable source suitable for establishing notability.--Chaser - T 04:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources giving coverage are found Corpx 05:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Corpx. Jakew 10:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * How very boring this is. Not in google news! Dear me it mustn't be important.  Tjamesjones 23:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Our guidelines are just that--guidelines. If you can make a convincing independent case that the software firm is notable, then I would !vote otherwise.--Chaser - T 23:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.  -- KTC 15:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.