Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMK King George V


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (non-admin closure) - subject of the article is notable. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 17:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

SMK King George V

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A common school that has no point of interest. Nothing special apparently. No whatsoever stark acheivement that may amaze.
 * Page aren't taken cared of. Historical details are still very unclear with little historical evidence. Perhaps a lie. Still very confusing and uses low resolution pictures depicting a usual activity in a regular educational institution. It's just an another school in seremban. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicklesputter (talk • contribs) 17:21, 19 June 2008


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable secondary school with plenty of history. --Eastmain (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Question Any notable alumni?  RC-0722 361.0/ 1  19:56, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * See SMK_King_George_V (that is, see the heading "Notable Georgians" in the article. --Eastmain (talk) 22:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops, edit conflict. They are now at SMK_King_George_V. TerriersFan (talk) 22:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  RC-0722 361.0/ 1  02:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is a particularly important Malaysian school with plenty of encyclopaedic content. It needs a cleanup, the list of societies can go for starters, but that is an editorial matter. I am curious what prompted this nomination; this is the nominator's only substantive contribution for about a year. TerriersFan (talk) 22:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as looks easily notable to me. Perhaps nomination was bad faith as comments on users page seems to show a bit of an attitude. Probably snow this and save everyones time?--Sting  Buzz Me...   22:53, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep looking at the article again, I'd say it's noteworthy.  RC-0722 361.0/ 1  02:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.