Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMK Lembah Subang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

SMK Lembah Subang

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability (in fact, the opposite: "This school is just like any ordinary other school." Bongomatic (talk) 11:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. All high schools are notable. -- Eastmain (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 17:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 17:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - high school pages should be expanded not deleted. SE Asian schools always have a poor internet presence and we should await the finding of local sources to avoid systemic bias. TerriersFan (talk) 22:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep grumble grumble probably notable grumble grumble systemic bias. (I can't see anything that makes this school notable, but for fairness sake if we're going to keep 'obviously' nn American and English high schools we may as well keep this one.) CRGreathouse (t | c) 23:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, as per CRGreathouse, a highschool is probably notable, the way its worded in the Strait Times article it doesn't give indication that it would be particularily small. --Soman (talk) 20:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep nomination is another fallacious argument which suggests that subjects must stand above their contemporaries. We do not keep only the top x% of articles within a topic.  Maybe someday we will make a best of wikipedia sister project, but until then, we have notability criteria which does not involve comparison between subjects.  Through a preponderance of afd closings, it has been shown that all high school articles are generally kept, as long as they contain verifiable encyclopedic content; as any high school can be found to be notable given sufficient effort, based on their prominence within their communities.  Jerry   delusional ¤ kangaroo 04:01, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.