Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMK Mahsuri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  05:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

SMK Mahsuri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not pass the notability guidelines for organisations/companies or general notability guideline. Confirmed by a google search. Inactive editing and very small articles. Please also refer WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. NgYShung (talk) 10:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a legitimate secondary school (SMK) in Malaysia. It can be verified at the Malaysia MOE and there seems to be some coverage in Harian Metro as well. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Reminder: That WP:V is important. And WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES is valid only if reliable independent sources can verify that the school exists. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per ORG. (ORG is the appropriate guideline, and it explicitly states that schools must meet the notability guidelines the same as any other organization.) I found some limited coverage, but, even giving the subject the benefit of the doubt due foreign schools, the available coverage is much less than the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources that the community requires. Rebb  ing  01:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per long standing consensus on educational institutions of this type, that if sources verify the institution exists, cf. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES that says: "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions and high schools are usually kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists", we default to keep. — Sam Sailor Talk! 09:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per source provided. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.