Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMK Seri Saujana (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

SMK Seri Saujana
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

2009 article about a school with a single source that doesn’t even mention it. I search for other sources shows only Facebook and directories with no in depth coverage in RIS. Survived AfD in 2009 because the consensus was that there must be sources. Twelve years later it doesn’t seem there are. Mccapra (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails notability. This article is written like a profile instead of an encyclopedia. Neo-corelight (Talk) 23:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete the article is written like promotional material for the school and all I could find when I looked was a few articles about the school and COVID. Which IMO don't work for notability since every school out there at this point is getting the same kind of WP:MILL COVID coverage. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:24, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.