Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMSAPI


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

SMSAPI

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines. Looks to be a product of ComVision and the article is more about the non-notable company than the non-notable product. J bh Talk  13:25, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Concur with nom. This should be prodded first before being brought here, though. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 17:08, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * delete - non-notable and lacking any sources. DangerDogWest (talk) 18:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America1000 03:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I see nothing to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  07:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Case for notability not established. Not every commercial software package (or cloud service) is sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. No evidence this package/service is particularly interesting or well-known. SJK (talk) 08:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.