Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMTown Live World Tour III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Enough sources to pass WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) — Hue  Sat  Lum  15:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

SMTown Live World Tour III
..... Well two of the shows have happened, so there you go. Second,the set list is an actual reliable source and so are the venues along with the dates and location. Third, these have been actual events. So just leave it be because I am sure many people find this information helpful and not just an announcement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.169.214 (talk) 04:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Delete as promotional. Only one of the shows has been done so far, and the only reliable source is nothing more than an announcement. Note that I removed some promo videos by SM Entertainment--this, like many pages on SM Entertainment, has no encyclopedic value. If reliable sources report on the actual events, that's a different story. Drmies (talk) 16:58, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep See Lady Gaga's The_Born_This_Way_Ball it have future dates too. Also I can see 5 reiable sources. If user Drimes want to delete future tour dates I'm fine with that, but I'm against deleting the entire page all together. It's like "One man's trash is another man's treasure", maybe user Drimes find something is useless, but for someone like kpop maybe finding the page valuable. --Lpmfx (talk) 20:06, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Michaela den (talk) 03:32, 30 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: I have added a few more WP:RS and to me it passes WP:GNG for notability.--Michaela den (talk) 04:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:51, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  →TSU tp* 06:16, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - There are enough WP:RS to pass WP:GNG. This is obviously notable.  →TSU tp* 06:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.