Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SM City Zamboanga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that coverage is insufficient.-- Kubigula (talk) 04:44, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

SM City Zamboanga

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article about a shopping mall that has not yet been built. No sources. FiachraByrne (talk) 12:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. No sources and no indication of notability. --DAJF (talk) 12:10, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 12:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * delete. As yet unbuilt, no coverage indicating notability. sonia ♫ 00:48, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Both comments above are FALSE. Here is one source that took very little time to find, which postulates about the desire to have the mall in their area: Should we welcome an SM in Zamboanga City? from Zambotimes.com. It appears that the nominators simply stated there are "no sources" without actually doing any research to qualify their statements, which nullifies those statements. Northamerica1000 (talk) 18:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment-The article was the fifth link in a Google search for SM City Zamboanga, here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Northamerica1000 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply - The Zambotimes.com article above does not actually support any of the information in this article - other than the name SM City Zamboanga - so unfortunately it does not constitute "in-depth coverage". Notability of this planned shopping centre is still very much in dispute. --DAJF (talk) 23:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete; does not appear to be notable. bobrayner (talk) 08:21, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.