Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SNP Trade Union Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 07:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

SNP Trade Union Group

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails WP:RS, in fact there are no sources for this article when nominated. It also fails WP:GNG Angryskies (talk) 17:32, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Angryskies (talk) 17:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Angryskies (talk) 17:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Angryskies (talk) 17:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Structural component of the SNP; possibly second largest membership organisation in Scotland. Easily passes the GNG.  AfD is not clean up.


 * Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 00:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Would appear to be notable enough, as above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:25, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article does not cite any references to demonstrate it's notability. The article can be draftified if necessary for improvements. --RaviC (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter whether the sources demonstrating notability are cited in the article itself. See WP:ARTN. — MarkH21talk 00:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article in the The Scotsman is an opinion piece, it's not clear to me that the 5-person Source News is a reliable source, and I only see passing mentions in the books The Scottish National Party: Transition to Power and States Falling Apart?: Secessionist and Autonomy Movements in Europe; I wouldn't count those towards WP:GNG/WP:ORGCRIT. The article from The Herald is significant coverage and a reliable source that should count towards GNG/ORGCRIT. Are there others though? I could only find passing mentions elsewhere. — MarkH21talk 00:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:32, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * @ : I stand corrected regarding the use of sources in the article. I'd also note your analysis seems to prove a lack of RS coverage for this group. --RaviC (talk) 17:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment More sourcing.


 * Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 01:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp×g 06:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per new sources (some of which I found on my own search prior to checking prior AfD comments, lol!) I'll incorporate them into the article if it's closed to keep. jp×g 04:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.