Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SN Systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 02:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

SN Systems

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Corporate puffery. It's a business, of which there are very many. Why is this one important, distinctive or notable by 3rd party sourcing? See also ProDG (software). Andy Dingley (talk) 13:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - While I find plenty of mentions of the company being bought by Sony, there is virtually no mention of them prior to that time. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  14:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - SN Systems were winning awards for their software back in 1999, before being bought by SCE: 1999 FRONT LINE AWARDS FINALISTS & WINNERS SnClee (talk) 16:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 18:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 18:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep They are a major player in video game development and have been for decades. Hard to find general references for because they're a fact of life if you're a game developer.  Working on it. - Richfife (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * This isn't a reliable source per Wikipedia standards, but it makes the point: testimonials. - Richfife (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Significant amount of RS coverage thus it meets the GNG. Considering the length of the "ProDG (software)" article, I see no problem with merging that one into "SN Systems" for the time being, but there seems to be enough RS coverage of even "ProDG (software)" to merit a standalone article down the road. Outright deletion of either article per the noms would be unhelpful. -Thibbs (talk) 12:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.