Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SOAK

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 04:59, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

SOAK
I can't even tell what this is meant to be. --Tabor 19:51, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
 * A company. --Freedom2005 19:52, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
 * There isn't even enough information in the article to identify the company in question. The entire text of the article is "It is a company to relax and to drink tea and other bevorages." D&B databases of 1.3 million North American companies and 1.6 million international companies do not show it. It is non-verifiable, and certainly non-notable, if it does indeed exist. --Tabor 20:12, 11 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - There is no content nor reference to understand the single sentence. - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  20:11, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no content. --Canderson7 20:15, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, can't find anything on Google or Yahoo! search that would seem to relate to this alleged company - it would be nice to have some evidence that it actually exists. --Dcfleck 20:42, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably one of those pearl tea bars that are all the rage. I'm partial to the stuff myself, but Wikipedia isn't an ad board. ---Isaac R 21:30, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Any article that is so incoherent that nobody can understand it, and is about a company so obscure that nobody can find out anything on the internet is clearly not sufficiently influential or well-known to warrant an article. Average Earthman 07:57, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.