Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SOCi (social media marketing)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

SOCi (social media marketing)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advert from a shill. Not notable. Awards are not major, just small local awards. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Current sourcing is mostly primary and routine announcements. There is a little local covereage but nothing of any depth. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:06, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and  WP:ORG and is clearly Promotional.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORP. And no wonder considering that the company is less than 3 years old. The "awards" are trivial, and the only sources are routine stuff about obtaining funding and hiring staff. --MelanieN (talk) 17:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.