Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SOTI Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:DGG under criterion G11 (unambiguous advertising or promotion). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

SOTI Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A Google News archive search fails to reveal, to me anyway, notable coverage in WP:RS that are not simply reprinted company press releases in various trades, per WP:CORPDEPTH. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:28, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:31, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello,

Thanks for your review of the SOTI Inc. page I've created.

I have tried to keep the content very factual and non-promotional, as my goal is not to create an advertisement on Wikipedia, but instead a basic company page. Could you let me know what you saw as advertorial? I will revise it immediately.

Today (7/9), I edited the content to remove what another user pointed out may sound promotional. I hope this assists keeping the page up.

I have tried following the same format as similar companies on the site: MobileIron and AirWatch.

Regarding significant articles, I want to provide the below coverage of SOTI from well respected journalists and publications. These articles are not reprinted press releases, and have editors tied to them.

The references in the page itself are not reprints of a press release. The InformationWeek piece is authored by a well respected journalist: Larry Seltzer

In addition, SOTI was the top scorer in a Network World review of Mobile Device Management vendors, available here: Network World - Top tools for BYOD management

I'd like to provide additional editorial features on the company and its solutions:

InformationWeek Education - Smartphones Hit Schools, MDM Vendors Don Thinking Caps

CMSwire - SOTI Releases MobiControl V10 to Manage Personal Devices in the Enterprise

eWeek - Soti Unveils MDM Platform MobiControl V10

Mobile Fanpage - Italian review of SOTI solution

Computing Canada - Last Year, We All Talked About a BYOD Problem, It's Time That We Acknowledge That Our Biggest Mobile Problems Are Now Under Control

InformationWeek BYTE - BYOD Tablets, Smartphones: About To 'Disrupt' The Classroom?

THE Journal - Westbury School District Deploys Mobile Device Management System

As time goes on, I'd like to expand the page to include more products, awards won, and additional information- but I wanted to start with a simple upload first.

I'd appreciate any help you can provide. Thank you!

Msalmassian (talk) 23:43, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:47, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 19:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Makes no claim to notability, and therefore has none. —Geoff Capp (talk) 05:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and salt. This is the third time someone has tried creating an article about the subject. If a non-Wikipedian wants to create it again, they should read the summary of our inclusion requirements, then ask at the WP:Help desk whether the available sources meet our requirements, then go to AfC if they meet them. By the way, I also tagged the article for speedy deletion: G11: unambiguous advertising or promotion, and User:DGG deleted it last night. Cheers, &mdash;Unforgettableid (talk) Unforgettableid (talk) 16:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.