Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SOTpay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not salting as it's been created only once at least under this name Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

SOTpay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence that this software meets WP:N, with virtually no coverage found by Google or Google News. The awards cited in the article, as far as I can tell, were won by the associated company Gala Tent, but there's no indication in the sources that were given (which I mostly removed before noticing the mention in the article of Gala Tent, which a couple of the sources did attest to) that they were for this software. Perhaps Gala Tent is notable but SOTpay isn't. Largoplazo (talk) 16:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have found more sources on the subject and have updated them to the article, maybe they will help. Also note that SOTpay is a product of Gala Tent. --Lingveno (talk) 18:42, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, SOTpay is a product of Gala Tent, but every product of a notable company (assuming Gala Tent is notable) isn't itself automatically notable. See WP:NOTINHERITED. Largoplazo (talk) 20:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Strong delete and salt Gala Tent and its owner Jason Mace (who's deleted article was also recently recreated at Jason Mace in what seems to be part of the same spam campaign) have spammed Wikipedia in the past. Anything connected with them is to be treated with great suspicion. This is all clearly written by he same person/people. One key "tell" is that they use the phrase "Chamber of Commerce" as if it uniquely identifies a body rather than being a description for many hundreds or thousands of different bodies worldwide. It's weird and distinctive. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:23, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt a long, long way off meeting WP:CORP. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion. SmartSE (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.