Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPA London


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 03:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

SPA London

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Pranjal.3029 (talk) 17:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) NOT Encyclopedic Content (WP:NOT) - The provided content describes the history and background of SPA London, including its origins and branches. While this information is informative, it lacks depth and does not provide a comprehensive understanding of the charity's impact, or significance. An encyclopedic article should ideally cover these aspects in more detail.
 * 2) Notability (WP:N and WP:ORG): The article provides some historical background about SPA London (, including its origins and expansion to the UK. However, it lacks specific information about the charity's notable impact, achievements, or recognition. To meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, a charity article should demonstrate WHY the organization is significant, its activities, and its impact on society or its field. This article currently does not provide enough information to establish notability in my opinion. There is also NO significant event or independent coverage (that I could find)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Pranjal.3029 (talk) 17:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Most of the article content concerns the origins and operations of the wider Shree Prajapati Association in the UK. Although each of their geographical locations is separately registered with the Charity Commission, with the Leicester and Birmingham branches far larger judging from their accounts, if there is a case for an article (and I am not seeing evidence to sustain that), then it should be for the overall organisation rather than this local branch. AllyD (talk) 06:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Considering this relative to WP:BRANCH (for its current London-centric scope) or WP:NONPROFIT for the potential wider rescoping I suggested above, I do not see the evidence to demonstrate attained notability here. AllyD (talk) 11:03, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. The current “source” is a directory link with no information.  I cannot verify that this organisation exists.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.