Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES AND THERE IMPACT ON INDIA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Singu larity  06:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES AND THERE IMPACT ON INDIA

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Violates WP:NOR and WP:NOT. This is a student essay, which seems not to be fully WP:NPOV either. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 06:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete par being the nominator Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 06:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, add WP:NOTOPINION to that list – Zedla (talk) 06:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:OR.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 07:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The user today provided a source for his article: 'GOVT.OF INDIA RECORDS,GDP,GNF OF INDIA AND VARIOUS NEWSPAPER.' However, how reliable a source are 'various newspapers?' More to the point, Wikipedia is Not a word for word repository for each and every government policy. This article should either be merged with Government of India--economic policy--or deleted ASAP. Bearing in mind the length of this tedious article, I lean towards the latter option. Artene50 (talk) 08:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above comments. (ONE COMMON PROBLEM IN WP IS THAT PEOPLE THINK ITS FOR POSTING THERE OWN IDEAS OR RESEARCH.) ;) Good Ol’factory (talk) 10:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 10:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, personal essay, original research. (The lack of paragraph division makes it hard to read the entire article.) J I P  | Talk 17:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NOR.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 20:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Poorly written article that fails WP:NPOV and [WP:NOTOPINION]]. Fails WP:N due to no reliable sources present in the article.-- RyRy5 ( talk ) 01:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm laughing hard as I type this, which is not the reaction most encyclopedia articles are expected to elicit. Biruitorul Talk 02:49, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; it's an essay, not an article. --Haemo (talk) 03:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.