Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPIN (cable system)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ on whether to redirect this, or to move it ito a proposed article about its successor. Suggest those discussions continue on the Talk page as I don't see a 4th relist establishing any clear path. Star  Mississippi  01:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

SPIN (cable system)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general notability requirement. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 17:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. I see a suggestion to divide an article, is this the target article you are suggesting? It's not clear what the consensus is here. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Internet, Oceania,  and New Zealand. UtherSRG (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not hellbent on keep this as a standalone article but we out to keep some record of proposed/unrealized submarine communications cables somewhere. Could be nice to divide List of international submarine communications cables into groups like "active", discontinued", and "unrealized".Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 07:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I would be good with that and making this a redirect to the list. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep this is well worth documenting
 * AaronVick (talk) 08:58, 30 November 2023 (UTC) — is a confirmed sock puppet of.
 * Can you speak to which notability policy would allow this article to continue as it is? notability is a requirement to be an article. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect/merge as @Crunchydillpickle's suggestion
 * Lewcm Talk to me! 22:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment: I support redirecting to List of international submarine communications cables, which could then be re-worked. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:05, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Suggestion: There is coverage in multiple independent reliable sources and I suspect that notability could be proven if someone developed and referenced the article. However, nobody has been interested enough to develop it much. There is not even an article for its successor project, the Hawaiki Cable, which is much more notable as it is an operational cable, and there is arguably demand for an article. I suggest we rename this "Hawaiki Cable", do basic reformatting, keeping the info about the SPIN predecessor, then wait and see whether anyone develops it. An article on an operational cable is much more likely to attract editor attention than a defunct cable proposal from the 2000s. Nurg (talk) 01:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.