Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPOILER (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. Mackensen (talk) 01:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

SPOILER (film)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - appears to fail WP:N. Otto4711 00:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Move to Spoiler (1998 film) - the film appears in the IMDb [], and it appears to have been distributed by a major studio, and received some sort of a public release. Seems notable enough, although the quality of the article itself leaves something to be desired. I suggest moving to an address including the date so that the page is not mistaken for a general explanation of the concept of a spoiler in a film. Terrafire 01:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * IMDB seeks to capture every movie regardless of any other factor so an IMDB listing by itself doesn;t mean much if anything in terms of notability. The release appears to have been direct-to-video and there do not appear to be reliable sources that are substantially about this film as WP:N requires. Otto4711 02:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, many notable actors making this stub a useful linkage page. Also it was also released in German and there are reviews in German. John Vandenberg 02:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 02:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, appearences by several notable actors, reviews are available in both German and English. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 06:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per above evidence that the film is real. Bravedog 17:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No one is suggesting that the silm is not real. The film's existence does not establish the film's notability. Otto4711 18:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Notability is always a dubious criteria. We have verifiable information that can be expressed in a neutral point of view. Good enough for this editor. Terrafire 13:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.