Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPOOFEM.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 13:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

SPOOFEM.com

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete promotional article about nn company Mayalld (talk) 14:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment/Question. I believe this AfD discussion should be bundled with Articles for deletion/LIGATT Security International. Is it too late to do so? KuyaBriBri Talk 15:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I should note that the primary content of this article was added by now-banned user and user, which bears a WP:DUCK resemblance to Melanie Banks, who is a PR employee of the company (see bottom of page). KuyaBriBri Talk 16:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, only sources I could find were press releases, which according to WP:CORP don't count towards notability. ~EdGl   (talk)  03:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Spam for a non-notable product/website. See also Articles for deletion/LIGATT Security International. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete blatent advertising, shows no notability. Bacchus87 (talk) 01:42, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Cannot find any neutral sources, written as advertising, possible hoax? PrettyxVacant (talk) 02:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.