Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPT Sports Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

SPT Sports Management

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP. Lack WP:SIGCOV, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:RS. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 03:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies,  and Sports.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete This is about a defunct company/organization therefore NCORP guidelines apply. There are particular criteria for establishing the notability of a company.
 * Unless blatantly obvious, I'm assuming all the sources are reliable and the publishers are corporately independent from the topic organization - but there's more requirements than just "RS" for establishing notability.
 * As per WP:SIRS *each* reference must meet the criteria for establishing notability - the quantity of coverage is irrelevant so long as we find a minimum of two
 * WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content".
 * "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. This is usually the criteria where most references fail. References cannot rely only on information provided by the company, quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews fail ORGIND. Whatever is left over must also meet CORPDEPTH.
 * An analysis of the refs reveals a couple of mentions-in-passing, Press Releases and announcements, all fail CORPDEPTH and/or ORGIND. Topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 16:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Almost a WP:PROMO. LibStar (talk) 05:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:52, 31 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.