Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SP ContaPlus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. This thing has been open long enough: non-consensus is clear. Drmies (talk) 19:45, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

SP ContaPlus

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Another unnotable accounting software for which I couldn't find any RS. Although it might be notable ("Nowadays, ContaPlus is the "accounting standard" in Spain with more than one million customers.") it's completely unreferenced and this cited sentence might be added by a PR agent. mabdul 11:28, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: There are entire books about it that are reliable and independent of the subject -, , , and . There is also . SL93 (talk) 20:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Those wouldn't count as either reliable sources or indicators of notability via coverage - they're simply guidebooks (two of them are the same) and for all I can tell, may be connected to the software publisher. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 16:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as notability not demonstrated via multiple, non-trivial, independent, reliable sources. Note that the Spanish Wikipedia article claims a more modest 600,000 customers (as opposed to a million in our one). It also has no working citations. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 16:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.