Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SQS United FC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

SQS United FC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An amateur club that fails WP:FOOTYN, and the references are just only for the team members, no any kind of source for the results and accomplishments of it which also fails WP:NOR in my opinion. FairyTailRocks (talk) 01:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 09:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 09:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 09:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 09:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 13:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - a non-notable club playing for a non-notable league. And an amateur one at that. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:36, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.