Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SRM innovaTion Software System


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  05:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

SRM innovaTion Software System

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Fails WP:ORG. Company not notable and just another start-up doing regular business. Non notable award mentioned to give weight to the article.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  07:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a small start-up company, only one year old and seemingly only a few employees. There are literally 0 sources which talk about this company, not even Non-RS blogs or similar websites. Not to speak about actual coverage in RS sources. They say they have some large clients like Microsoft, but even if thats true WP:INHERITORG applies anyway. The article therefore fails WP:GNG generally and WP:NCORP specifically. The article was created by a single purpose account which has a sockpuppet investigation ongoing currently. Probably a WP:Promo article. Dead Mary (talk) 08:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I speedied it, but the template was removed by the article creator and than a single edit IP - probably the same. An earlier article was deleted A7 on 7 May. I concur that I can find nothing, other than their own self-promotion - Arjayay (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.