Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SRT Tomahawk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a valid reason to delete an article. (non-admin closure) sst ✈(conjugate) 15:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

SRT Tomahawk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability. This does not seem to be a 'real car', merely something that exists in a video game. Also WP:TOOSOON; 'In production by 2035. TheLongTone (talk) 17:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Draft and userfy as it seems this article is not yet fully blossomed. SwisterTwister   talk  04:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * See WP:NOEFFORT. North America1000 04:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – The topic meets WP:GNG. Source examples include, but are not limited to:, , , , . North America1000 04:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per the research by . The coverage in The Detroit News, Kelley Blue Book, Motor Trend, and the other sources demonstrates that the subject passes Notability. Cunard (talk) 06:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as reliable sources have been found, as shown above, I think WP:GNG is passed.Atlantic306 (talk) 18:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * IMO any source that would write about such a witless idea is ipso facto not 'reliable', clearly having there head somewhere around the juncltion of coln and small intestine. I cannot see how this is worth more than a mention in the article on the video game. But of course Wikipedia clearly favours trivia over substance.TheLongTone (talk) 15:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.