Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSA & Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

SSA & Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. The article is sourced to several dead links, promotional pages, business announcements, etc, without a single verifiable reference to substantial coverage in a reliable independent source. One or two of the references, while related to the topic of "six sigma", do not actually mention this business at all. The article is also somewhat promotional. (A PROD was removed without any explanation, by an editor using an IP address with no other edits.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 17:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom. Most of the current links are dead, and the other deal more with the concept of Six Sigma than with this company. A google news search resulted in very limited coverage, a couple of slight mentions, but mostly press releases. A newspapers search produced zero results.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now as of all my searches, the best I found was one mention. SwisterTwister   talk  04:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.