Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSBBW


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

SSBBW
Unsourced definition; wikipedia is not a dictionary, and especially not a dictionary of rambling comments on strange internet acronyms Sdedeo (tips) 04:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * delete per nom and WP:NEO. Mango juice talk 04:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment 86.139 is me, curse my not clicking 'remember me' this morning. QuagmireDog 10:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. J I P  | Talk 09:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, whereas terms like 'BBW' and 'feeder' are established, there seems little point in speculating over offshoot terms where no clear precedent has been set. If the BBW community can make up its mind on exactly how they wish to classify the weight ranges (or someone can point out a source showing they have), the article can be recreated if necessary or I'll change my vote. 86.139.126.59 10:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to BBW. Real term, but not used much - as it just starts arguments because the "dividing line" between "Supersize" and "Regular" is as arbitrary as how many grains of sand make a pile. The topic of this article could never be more than stub anyway, any useful information woudl be best merged into the BBW article anyway. "Hypersize" is definately a neologism though - never heard that one.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.